Hooray for Obushma

This needs no intro:

The More Things "Change," Episode 1,723 Posted by Mike Tennant at 08:23 AM at LewRockwell.com Obama, who ... correctly criticized President Bush for having issued signing statements nullifying portions of bills he'd signed, just "issued one of his own, declaring five provisions in the spending bill [which he signed] to be unconstitutional and nonbinding, including one aimed at preventing punishment of whistleblowers."

It's a race with the clock. Will average Americans snap out of their fairy-tale fantasies before the elections of 2012? Of course they won't. By my even asking such a silly question, I could correctly be accused of living in a fairy-tale fantasy myself. Even if their favorite political heroes personally stole their houses from them and smacked them alongside their heads with a 2x4, most Americans would still cling to their fairy-tale fantasies — while also continuing to laugh at, malign, demonize and/or ridicule the one or two politicians who actually want to save this country and the Constitution upon which it was founded.

Great Question

"All the hardcore, Jim Jones kool-aid drinking Obama supporters never really cared about ending the wars. They just wanted a Democrat to micromanage them. Obama has made it abundantly clear his policies are no different than Bush's. So why then, did all these Obamabots hate Bush so much?" ••• JesseKantstopolis, who wrote it as a comment on this excellent YouTube video on March 4, 2009.

Hey! I Like an Angry Song! ;-)

I just found this independently produced music video via a link at another web site and must admit that it is quite catchy. Furthermore, not only is Aimee Allen very attractive (in spite of those tattoos), but she has a great grasp on the situation (so say I). You will also notice that her anger has a positive message behind it (with such an appealing smile, how could she not be promoting a positive message?). I am feeling very tempted to be infatuated with her, regardless of (sob!) my being "too old." But I won't. I'm not that much of a weakling (ha?).

Note: In spite of the immediate goal of this video, which you will learn at the 23-second mark (forgive me ;-), the overall theme, which begins at the 37-second mark, is quite well done. I hope you won't stop watching it. It's not that long, and it isn't (unlike yours truly) a broken record (no pun intended).

Update: No wonder she is predisposed to sing a song like this (and I am predisposed to be infatuated with her): She's a native of Montana. ;-)

https://dai.ly/x3yrih6

P.S. I also really like the softer songs that play automatically at her MySpace link above (especially the second one, which is entitled I'm Here). She's got a beautiful voice and a nice old-fashioned style.

Ron Paul in New Hampshire (2008); Hand Count vs. Diebold

Even though I was expecting the following results, I still don't feel better for having seen them. In fact, it makes me feel worse because I know that contesting them is just as productive as contesting a referee's horribly wrong call (with replay video to prove it) that steals the legitimate victory from one team and gives it to the undeserving team. The crime will be recorded as reality for all eternity. Period. End of Story.

From what I've seen, the following information is just the tip of the iceberg. I've been too worked up to look at the rest right now because I know no one will do anything about it, and, even if they were to try, the criminals own the government and the courts and the media, so nothing would come of it.

Seventy-one percent of New Hampshire precincts voted on hackable Diebold voting machines. The good news is that that leaves a bunch of hand-counted precincts to use as standards by which to gauge the accuracy of the computer votes.

According to hackable Diebold voting machines, Ron Paul received only eight percent of the NH vote. I found that very suspicious since he had polled at 14 percent just the day before. Hillary, whom I've grown to despise, was behind by ten or more percent in the most recent polls, yet she won the primaries? Those were the only two discrepancies, and they were the two I had been expecting. I, therefore, immediately knew something was fishy last night. Today I fully expected to see the information that I have posted below.

Overall, at least thirty New Hampshire precincts counted the votes by hand, not by computer. Here are the results for Ron Paul in the hand-counted precincts:

What the Hand Count Shows
Not a single hand-count township showed less than 10%.
Supposedly, Ron Paul got 8%. This does not make sense.

Richmond is hand count 34% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Lyman is hand count 28.7% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Orange is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Harts location is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Wentworth is hand count 24% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Goshen is hand count 17.68% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Marlow is hand count 16.6% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Cornish is hand count 14.8% for dr. Paul…100% reporting
Rumney is hand count 14.5% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Croydon is hand count 14 % for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Dorchester is hand count 13.89% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Effingham is hand count 13% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Albany is hand count 12.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Antrim is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
South hampton is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Sullivan is hand count 12.61% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Troy is hand count 12.21% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Mason is hand count 11.88% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Newport is hand count 11.45% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Charlstown is hand count 11.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Allenstown is hand count 11.16% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Bristol is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Warren is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Strafford is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Washington is hand count 11.02% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Lancaster is hand count 10.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Springfield is hand count 10.6% for Dr.Paul…100% reporting
Wilton is hand count 10.37% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Northfield is hand count 10.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Mont Vernon is hand count 10.25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting

Source

For the record, the 30 precincts above combined give Ron Paul of 14.8 percent of the vote.

Obama actually won by four percentage points over Clinton in those same 30 precincts.

Final Note
One precinct, Sutton, actually reported zero votes for Ron Paul, but upon being caught in the lie, were forced to admit that he had actually received 31 votes. There are other precincts that may have dishonestly reported zero, too, especially on machines that cannot be double checked.

-----

Is the corporate mainstream media going to report this unnatural discrepency? No way on earth!